Tradeify

Tradeifyautomation: exclusive-clause

5 account types, every rule rendered straight from the registry. Answer the questions below and the page lands on the one account that matches — with its rules and its battery.

5Accountseval + funded
5Battery data0 untested
exclusive-clauseAutomationregistry flag
Find your account
  1. FirmTradeify
  2. Step 1

    Select Plan

    5 accounts still match5 with battery data
    Starting Balance$25,000
    Max Drawdown$1,000
    Drawdown TypeEOD trail
  3. 1 more decision after this

Compliance notes

6 on file
Exclusive-clause automation status
Tradeify's own rules sheet: "Allowed only when the strategy is solely owned by the trader and not shared. Tradeify may request proof. HFT/exploitative simulated-fill strategies are prohibited; bot use across multiple firms is restricted." The registry's automation_status='exclusive-clause' is that clause, now citable to a primary source rather than to memory. NO TRADEIFY SUPPORT RULING IS ON FILE — in particular, nothing confirms how the 'across multiple firms' restriction is applied to a trader running one method at two firms.
source: Tradeify_Futures_Full_Rules_2026-08-15.pdf p7 §A
Elite Live transition is UNMODELLED — and it ENDS a conveyor
Selection to Elite Live is DISCRETIONARY on Tradeify's side but MANDATORY once made, and it CLOSES ALL of the trader's sim accounts and evaluations. Only funded accounts with at least one payout transition; eligibility for consideration begins after 3 payouts on one account OR 10 in total. No page on this site models it, because attaching a probability to a discretionary selection would be fabrication (the Topstep LFA precedent). DIRECTION: OPTIMISTIC for every Tradeify funded figure — a real conveyor can be forcibly ended, and sim profit does not transfer.
source: TRADEIFY-FULL-MATRIX-SPEC-2026-08-25.md §0.4
Lightning accounts are OUT OF SCOPE — a documented exclusion
Tradeify's Lightning plan is not wired, not battery-tested and not published here. It is excluded deliberately, not omitted silently: it was outside the scope Arman ratified for this build, and the rules sheet itself flags a known conflict on the Lightning 25K DLL. The 50K / 100K / 150K sizes of Growth and Select are out of scope for the same reason. Nothing on this site describes them.
source: TRADEIFY-FULL-MATRIX-SPEC-2026-08-25.md §0.1
Pricing is the AUG promo — OPTIMISTIC after 31 Aug 2026
Every Tradeify fee on this site is the AUG code's AFTER-5-USES tier (30% off): Growth 25K $69.30, Select 25K $76.30. That tier is used because a conveyor buys many accounts and it is the steady-state price. List is $99 / $109; the first-5-uses tier is $59.40 / $65.40 and 5-packs run $56.43 / $62.13 each (page facts, not walker inputs). Resets are the regular $60 — the sheet's checkout note refuses to assume the promo discounts them. The code is advertised through 31 Aug 2026 11:59 PM EST; after that every fee figure here is OPTIMISTIC vs list.
source: Tradeify_Futures_Full_Rules_2026-08-15.pdf p1 §2; Arman 2026-08-25
Microscalping payout test — measured on the books, not modelled
Funded payouts require that BOTH more than 50% of trades AND more than 50% of profits come from trades held longer than 10 seconds. The walker does not enforce it; instead every Tradeify funded page publishes the MEASURED hold-time split of its own books (97.5% of trades and 100.0% of gross profit from holds longer than 10 seconds, over 32,126 trades, counting same-minute trades as FAILING). Both legs pass with a wide margin — as a statement about these books, not as a compliance certificate.
source: Tradeify_Futures_Full_Rules_2026-08-15.pdf p7 §A
Select Sim Funded is TWO pages, and the choice is PERMANENT
Passing the Select evaluation does not hand over an account; it hands over a permanent choice between the Flex and the Daily payout path ("choice permanence: permanent after account selection"). Both have a full battery here and they share one book set — only the payout rules differ. The earlier data-less `funded-select-25k` stub published one path's rules as if the choice did not exist and is superseded by these two pages.
source: Tradeify_Futures_Full_Rules_2026-08-15.pdf p4 §B; spec §0.2

Reference

loads when opened
All 5 accountsdirectory
Full rules, account by account5 tables
Standing caveats4
  • Fill model is optimistic: touch fills, zero net slippage, entry-bar SL/TP not checked inside the fill minute. Simulated results are not expected live results.
  • Rolling-cohort starts overlap and share trades — pass rates and payout rates from overlapping windows are NOT independent samples; n_eff is stated wherever rates are compared.
  • Rules on this page are rendered verbatim from the registry in backtests/spec_suite/propfirm_rules.py. Registry entries flagged ⚠️ / UNVERIFIED are reproduced with their flags — an unflagged number is only as good as the registry's own sourcing.
  • MES-centric, recent-regime edge (2024+). Nothing here is a forward test and nothing here promotes a method variant (EXTENDED-TEST-SPEC §7).