trading / confluences / c5_htf

c5 — higher-timeframe structure support LIVE

Live gate · In the live P1 Master gate stack today.

BURNED DATA — 2019–2026 was selected on before this lab existedNOT TV-VERIFIEDSCREENING ≠ CERTIFICATIONOPTIMISTIC FILL MODEL — touch fills, zero slippageMES ONLY · P1 M2 managementSOLO LEDGER IS NOT A BOOK — never summed

What it asks

Is there a higher-timeframe fair-value gap or 30m/1H pattern backing the trade?

Exact definition · as the engine implements it

Live confluence c5_htf, read from the engine-stamped `conf_bits`.

Engine meaning: HTF FVG or 30m/1H pattern support.

Commissioning stats — exp-0001, 2026-08-05

Gate 2 of 7, EXPLORATORY. Conditional association stratified on the count of the other five live bits, against this bit's own prevalence-matched null. This report supersedes its own first version, which used a single pooled placebo p95 and published a false headline; the superseded line is left on the ledger unedited (PROTOCOL gate 7).

Prevalence
28.22%
of 2,289 filled rows
Δ mean solo R
+0.0886
stratified on other 5 bits
Matched-null p
0.1525
84.75th pctile of own null
BH q (6-bit family)
0.3480
exploratory sort key
Bootstrap 95% CI
[-0.0282, +0.2090]
week-block · p=0.1399
Commissioning verdict
WEAK
2026-08-05 · exp-0001

Family verdict (verbatim, 2026-08-05): EXPLORATORY, NO PROMOTION. Under a correct prevalence-matched null, 1 of the six live confluences clears its own noise floor: c4_sweep +0.1312 R, matched p=0.043 (95.7th percentile of its own null). Over the 6-bit family that is BH q=0.26, its 95% CI touches zero, and all seven years are selection-burned — so it earns a pre-registration (gates 3-4), not a promotion. The other five do not clear their matched nulls. The previous headline on this id ('no real bit clears the placebo p95', 'ALL SIX indistinguishable') was FALSE: it applied one mixed-cloud p95 to every bit, distorting percentiles by up to 22 points in both directions.

Composition findings

Config-grid involvement — 2026-08-07

Paired replay on the certified conflab-livegate-v1 stream, $250-nominal basis (~2.6% high versus engine dollars), 31 cells examined with ZERO multiplicity correction and no p-values. Every cell below is post-hoc on data the bits were screened on.

CellNetΔ netTradesWRexpRmax EOD DDΔ pre-2025Δ 2025+
BASE — live A/B take rule (count >= 4)$10,39952654.0%+0.0791$10,826
swap_b_actfloor__c5_htf$11,669+$1,26997253.3%+0.0480$10,159−$2+$1,272
swap_b_gapadr__c5_htf$6,482−$3,91788753.1%+0.0292$13,094−$3,552−$365
swap_b_onbreak__c5_htf$5,803−$4,59741953.2%+0.0554$7,054+$580−$5,177

Ruling on these cells

The second PRE-REGISTERED replacement slot, and the same story. b_actfloor +$1,269 (entirely 2025+; pre-2025 is −$2 flat) — under the $1,500/12m promotion bar by an order of magnitude once annualised over 7.16 years. b_onbreak −$4,597, b_gapadr −$3,917. No registration earned.

Status — LIVE

WEAK. +0.089 mean solo R, matched p=0.153 (84.75th percentile), q=0.348 — below its own noise floor. Named with c1 as the second weak slot by the 2026-07-21 deep-dive. Commissioning also killed a folk belief here: c5 and c6 are NOT entangled (phi −0.027) despite sharing HTF machinery.

Retest path

c5 was the second PRE-REGISTERED replacement slot of the 2026-08-07 screen. All three A/B challengers lost or were rejected (b_actfloor +$1,269 on burned data — under the $1,500/12m bar by an order of magnitude; b_onbreak −$4,597; b_gapadr −$3,917). New attempt = new grid, unburned data, full gauntlet.

Standing caveats

screen-2026-08-07stream conflab-pop-v1opportunity sha256 b62ca795de4a647b…harness ok · 0 real violations